The Great AI Capital Expenditure Debate: What It Means for Investors
Key Takeaways:
- As worldwide AI spending reaches trillions of dollars, scrutiny is increasing over whether elevated spending can be sustained in the race to lead AI development.
- AI companies are positioning compute power as an increasingly valuable resource with potentially substantial demand. Rapid revenue growth across parts of the sector supports the bull case, while critics question whether future revenue and profits will justify the scale of current capital spending.
- While much of the spotlight is on AI capex and the technology’s gatekeepers, investor attention is also extending to companies that supply the materials and infrastructure needed to build power grids, semiconductor facilities, and data centers.
The rise of AI this decade has led to a spending boom driven by the world’s most valuable tech companies. Total AI spending is expected to climb from $1.76 trillion in 2025 to $2.6 trillion this year and $3.49 trillion next year, according to tech research firm Gartner.
Tech giants such as Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are boosting their spending on new plants and equipment from $125 billion in 2021 to an estimated $700 billion in 2026 and $1 trillion next year. In turn, AI accounted for a third of U.S. economic growth in 2026, said analysts from global bank ING, driven by a spending surge for building data centers and expanding power grids.
AI is now becoming the most well-funded infrastructure investment in recent history, surpassing what the U.S. spent on the Apollo space program in the 1960s and the multi-decade interstate highway system buildout. And observers expect even more spending in the years ahead. JPMorgan projected that AI data center spending could reach more than $5.5 trillion through 2030, with external estimates expecting as much as $10 trillion.
At the core of this capex explosion are the AI boom architects that invest in each other’s growth.
Money-Go-Round: The Circular Investment Model Fueling the AI CapEx Boom
Today, the world’s biggest AI companies are interconnected in an investment web wherein they finance each other through equity, venture, and compute (processing power for AI models) deals. This is the assertion of the AI Circular Economy website, which tracks 29 AI companies’ transactions with one another.
Proponents have hailed this arrangement as the growth driver keeping the global economy running amid crises in many other industries, while critics called it a circular financing scheme that could crash and burn if demand is not sustained.
Chip making giant Nvidia is one of the focal points of the AI capex boom. In August, Nvidia agreed to provide up to $105 billion worth of credit and compute for an OpenAI data center in Ohio, while also securing deals with six large asset managers to line up more than $500 billion in capital for companies that will build data centers and buy Nvidia chips in the process.
Nvidia’s recent investments, while huge, have been normalized amid the rise of AI. Some of the other notable business arrangements among AI’s stewards, according to AI Circular Economy, include:
- Microsoft’s 27% stake in OpenAI Group PBC, alongside OpenAI’s commitment to purchase an additional US$250 billion in Azure services.
- Amazon’s over-$83 billion into Anthropic and OpenAI combined. Both companies committed more than $238 billion of compute back to Amazon Web Services.
- Google’s $40 billion investment into Anthropic, which agreed to deploy a million Google tensor processing units (TPUs) used for boosting AI workloads.
In response to critics of Nvidia’s deals, CFO Colette Kress pointed out, “We are going through a major computing platform shift, the creation of one of the most important technologies in human history, and these are once-in-a-generation companies.”
Spend Money to Make Money: The Bull Case and “Unlimited” AI Compute Demand
The main hypothesis driving the AI capex boom is the assumption that as AI grows, compute will be a high-demand resource that, as OpenAI President Greg Brockman put it, is “becoming the new oil.”
AI companies say they are seeing a surge in demand for their services. AI-centric cloud provider Nebius shared there was more demand than they’ve been able to fulfill for some time now, while the CEO of processor maker Cerebras Systems, Andrew Feldman, noted that “the demand for compute far outstrips available capacity” contributing to shortages of data-center capacity and other inputs.
“I somewhat think of AI demand as almost unlimited,” former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger told CNBC, adding that energy availability is “the only real limiter.”
Some observers acknowledged the circular nature of the deals, but pointed out that the companies involved have sound financial numbers. “The interconnected nature of the AI ecosystem is real,” said Gary Tan, portfolio manager at Allspring Global Investments. “But near term risks are mitigated by the strong balance sheets, cash flows and credit quality of the major providers funding the buildout.”
So far, the numbers have supported this assessment. While the S&P 500 needs $2 to $3 in assets to generate $1 in sales, a gigawatt of computing power costing $40 billion to build can produce $40 billion in sales, an impressive 1:1 asset-to-sales ratio, according to Barrons. Meanwhile, JPMorgan analysts predicted that AI cloud providers, model providers, and neoclouds could make a combined revenue run-rate of about $1.6 trillion by the end of 2026, then grow that by 10% to 20% annually to reach $2.5 trillion to $3 trillion by 2030.
Nonetheless, the rising capex of the AI frontrunners is triggering questions from the investors that finance them.
When Will We Make Money: The Bear Case and AI Bubble Concerns
With AI-related capex currently in the trillions, AI companies’ investors are beginning to demand more results from the money being spent on advancing the technology, according to CNBC. These companies are on track to have bigger capex than free cash flow by 2027.
This unease has been unfolding in recent AI-centric financing deals. In July, Meta secured a $12.3 billion bond to build a data center in Texas. This bond has a 7.5% rate, considered higher than the going rates for previous projects. Nvidia’s recent $105 billion deal for OpenAI’s data center buildout was originally worth up to $250 billion, marking a decrease in commitment as deal negotiations went on.
When asset manager Fidelity surveyed financial advisors in July, 42% of them said AI companies’ valuations have been too high compared to financial performance. Fidelity added that advisors are increasingly seeking evidence of AI-driven growth, a noticeable shift from previous enthusiasm about AI investments.
This more cautious stance may end up clashing with even higher capex projections in the years ahead. Dom Rizzo, the global technology equity fund manager at T. Rowe Price, forecasted that companies are halfway through the spending cycle, and are on the cusp of an acceleration in capex.
Nevertheless, the evolving financial story for AI companies may assuage capex concerns. JPMorgan recently said that the acceleration in revenue at AI companies has strengthened the economic case behind the sector’s enormous infrastructure spending.
Meanwhile, as investors debate about AI capex, the wider AI buildout narrative may unearth other opportunities for investors. After all, spending is one thing, but getting the resources needed for a buildout is another.
In a Gold Rush, Sell Shovels: Real-World Material Winners of the AI Spending Spree
In the AI race, capital isn’t the only limit. Power infrastructure, chip manufacturing, and enterprise integration bottlenecks dictate real-world outcomes. The evolving AI landscape has resulted in a few unlikely winners, like Japanese toilet maker Toto and food seasoning brand Ajinomoto, which found new lucrative roles in the AI capex boom by making chipmaking equipment parts and insulating materials, respectively.
As the cases of Toto and Ajinomoto illustrate, the AI investment landscape also extends to companies producing materials and components used in power grids, semiconductor facilities, data centers and related infrastructure.
For instance, let’s focus on the power angle. Energy systems require significant mineral inputs. Wind turbines use rare earth elements in magnets. Solar supply chains require materials such as silicon, silver, copper, and aluminium. Power grids require large amounts of copper and aluminium. As electricity demand grows from data centers, EVs, industrial electrification, and renewables, investors are paying closer attention to these resources. SmallCap Asia discussed this in detail in a recent article.
While it may be too early to identify which specific resource shortages could slow AI infrastructure deployment, it is clear that AI will require more physical materials, more power, and more resilient supply chains, according to fund manager VanEck.
As the AI story continues to evolve, companies need to clearly communicate how their products and services fit within the broader economy and support emerging technologies. Global One Media works with public and pre-IPO companies involved in exploring for and supplying the physical materials that support technology, energy and infrastructure markets.
Contact us to learn how Global One Media can help communicate your company’s investment story to a global audience.
Investor Relations Firms in Canada: A Due-Diligence Guide for Public Companies
Choosing an investor relations firm in Canada requires more than comparing service lists or looking for the provider with the largest claimed audience. Public companies should evaluate a potential partner based on its experience with listed issuers and capital markets, strategic communications capabilities, content quality, distribution approach, reporting, understanding of disclosure requirements, client evidence, and responsiveness.
For Canadian issuers in particular, the right provider should also understand how investor communications fit within the company’s obligations under securities laws and applicable exchange requirements. An investor relations communications provider can help an issuer develop and distribute its story, but it does not replace management, legal counsel, regulatory advisers, or the issuer’s own responsibility for compliance.
This guide explains the different types of investor relations providers, what public companies should evaluate before appointing one, common warning signs, and the questions worth asking during due diligence.
What Do Investor Relations Firms and Communications Providers Do?
Investor relations sits at the intersection of corporate communications, capital markets, and shareholder engagement. The exact scope can vary significantly from one provider to another.
Some firms focus primarily on traditional investor relations activities such as shareholder communications, investor targeting, roadshows, and market intelligence. Others specialize in financial communications, digital marketing, media production, investor-focused content, or distribution. More integrated providers may combine several of these functions.
For public companies, investor relations communications can include developing the company’s investor narrative, preparing corporate and digital content, producing executive interviews, managing social channels, organizing investor webinars, supporting website communications, distributing content, and analyzing campaign performance.
The key distinction is that these services support how a company communicates with the market. They do not make the provider the company’s securities lawyer, broker or investment adviser, nor do they transfer responsibility for regulatory compliance away from the issuer.
That distinction is particularly important in Canada. National Policy 51-201 – Disclosure Standards provides guidance concerning disclosure practices, including timely disclosure and selective disclosure. Exchange-specific requirements may also apply depending on where the issuer is listed.
For example, TSX Venture Exchange Policy 3.4 – Investor Relations, Promotional and Market-Making Activities governs investor relations, promotional, and market-making activities for TSXV issuers and expressly states that such activities must be conducted in accordance with securities laws and exchange requirements.
What Types of Investor Relations Providers Are Available?
Public companies generally encounter several different models when evaluating investor relations support.
A traditional investor relations consultancy may focus heavily on capital-markets positioning, shareholder communications, investor targeting, and management advice.
A financial communications or public relations firm may concentrate more on corporate news, media relations, reputation, and thought leadership.
A digital investor marketing provider may specialize in social media, paid distribution, video, digital campaigns, and investor audience development.
A specialist content or media platform may provide executive interviews, editorial exposure, newsletters, video distribution, or access to a defined investor audience.
An integrated provider brings several of these functions together, potentially combining strategy, messaging, content production, digital marketing, distribution, and performance reporting within one team.
There is no universally appropriate model. A company preparing for a new listing may have different communications requirements from a producing mining company, an established technology issuer or a business seeking to reach investors in new geographic markets.
The more useful question is whether the provider’s capabilities match the issuer’s communications objectives, internal resources, listing environment, and target audiences.
How Should Public Companies Evaluate an Investor Relations Firm?
1. Public company and capital markets experience
Start with the provider’s actual experience working with publicly traded companies.
Public company communications operate within a different environment from conventional consumer or corporate marketing. Information may be market-sensitive, disclosure timing matters, and messaging must remain consistent with information the company is permitted to communicate publicly.
Ask which exchanges, industries, and stages of company development the team has worked with. Relevant experience does not necessarily require specialization in one sector, but the provider should understand the realities of communicating for listed companies.
For Canadian issuers, experience supporting companies listed on exchanges such as the TSX, TSX Venture Exchange, and Canadian Securities Exchange may be particularly relevant.
2. Strategic communications capabilities
Strong execution begins with the underlying story.
A provider should be able to understand the company’s business, identify information relevant to investors and translate complex subjects into accurate, accessible communications without oversimplifying material facts.
Ask how the firm develops an investor narrative, how messaging evolves as the company reaches new milestones and how that narrative is carried consistently across interviews, social media, websites, presentations, and other channels.
This can be especially important in technical sectors such as mining, biotechnology, energy, and emerging technology, where investors may need additional context to understand the significance of a company update.
3. Content quality and production resources
Assess what the provider can actually produce and who does the work.
Services may include writing, graphic design, executive interviews, video production, social media, websites, webinars and other digital assets, but the depth of those capabilities varies.
Review recent examples rather than relying solely on service descriptions. Look at whether the content is accurate, consistent with the client’s positioning, appropriate for a public company, and adapted effectively for different channels.
Companies should also understand which capabilities are managed in-house and which are outsourced. Either approach can work, but issuers should know how their communications will be produced and coordinated.
4. Investor-audience reach and distribution
Large audience numbers alone do not establish that a distribution strategy is effective.
Ask where content is distributed, who the intended audience is, whether reach is organic or paid, and how the provider determines which channels are relevant to a particular issuer.
A Canadian company seeking greater visibility with U.S. investors, for example, may require a different distribution mix from a company looking to reach investors in Europe or Asia.
The objective should be relevant audience development rather than exposure for its own sake.
5. Reporting and campaign optimization
Investor communications should be measurable even when the ultimate market response cannot be attributed to one campaign.
Useful reporting can include content output, video views, reach, impressions, engagement, website traffic, email performance, and other communications metrics. The provider should also be able to explain what those numbers mean and how results influence future activity.
Communications performance should be assessed primarily through communications and digital visibility metrics rather than promises about market outcomes.
6. Knowledge of disclosure and exchange considerations
An investor relations provider does not need to be the issuer’s lawyer, but it should understand that public-company communications take place within a regulated environment.
For TSX Venture Exchange issuers, Policy 3.4 sets requirements relating specifically to investor relations and promotional activities, including disclosure, compensation arrangements, filings, and prohibited activities. The policy should be read together with other exchange requirements and applicable securities laws.
TSX issuers are also subject to timely disclosure requirements. TMX provides a dedicated Guide to TSX Timely Disclosure Requirements and other disclosure resources for listed companies.
The Canadian Securities Exchange maintains its own requirements. Its current Policy 7 – Investor Relations, Promotional Activity, and Other Significant Transactions addresses investor relations and promotional activity, among other matters.
These requirements are one reason issuers should maintain appropriate internal review and approval processes. An external communications provider can support those processes, but management remains responsible for the issuer’s disclosure and compliance, with legal and regulatory advisers consulted where appropriate.
7. Client evidence and independent proof points
Look for evidence rather than broad claims.
Useful proof points can include identifiable clients, clearly defined campaign periods, attributable testimonials, specific communications results, case studies, and independent reviews.
A case study is more useful when it explains the initial communications challenge, what the provider actually did, and which measurable results followed. Statistics without a timeframe or clear source deserve additional scrutiny.
Testimonials should likewise be attributable to identifiable individuals and companies and approved for public use.
8. Geographic reach and responsiveness
Location matters, but it should not be considered in isolation.
Investor audiences cross borders, particularly for companies with multiple listings or international shareholder bases. A provider’s team coverage, working hours, knowledge of different markets, and ability to respond when news breaks may therefore matter as much as the location of its registered office.
This is particularly relevant for companies communicating with investors across North America, Europe, and Asia.
Does a Canadian Public Company Need to Appoint a Canada-Based Investor Relations Firm?
Not necessarily.
A provider’s physical location is one consideration, but it is not the only measure of suitability. Relevant public-company experience, understanding of the issuer’s exchange and disclosure environment, quality of execution, investor-audience reach, responsiveness and geographic coverage may be more important.
What matters is whether the provider can support the issuer effectively while working within the company’s existing legal, regulatory, and disclosure processes.
For example, an international provider may be appropriate for a Canadian issuer seeking audiences in the United States, Europe, or Asia, provided its team understands the environment in which the issuer operates and can coordinate effectively with management and the company’s professional advisers.
The same principle works in reverse: choosing a provider simply because it has a Canadian office does not by itself establish that the firm has the appropriate sector experience, production capabilities, investor reach, or reporting standards.
Questions to Ask Before Appointing an Investor Relations Provider
Public companies should consider questions such as:
- What experience do you have working with publicly traded companies and issuers listed on our exchange?
- Which parts of the work are performed in-house?
- Who will manage our account and create our content?
- How do you develop and maintain an investor narrative?
- How do you handle technical or potentially market-sensitive information?
- Which investor audiences and geographic markets can you realistically reach?
- How is content distributed, and which channels are paid versus organic?
- What performance metrics will we receive and how often?
- Can you provide recent case studies with defined campaign periods?
- Are your client testimonials and references attributable and verifiable?
- What is your approval process before content is published?
- How do you account for exchange and disclosure considerations?
- How quickly can your team respond to company news or changing priorities?
- What is included in the agreement and what incurs additional charges?
- Who owns the content, creative assets and accounts created during the engagement?
Warning Signs and Unrealistic Promises
Public companies should be cautious when a prospective provider promises outcomes that no communications firm can control.
Claims that a campaign will guarantee investor interest, increase a share price, improve valuation, or produce a particular market reaction deserve particular scrutiny.
Other warning signs can include vague explanations of where content will be distributed, audience numbers without supporting context, an inability to provide recent examples, unclear reporting, excessive reliance on stock performance as evidence of marketing effectiveness, and reluctance to explain how public company content is reviewed before distribution.
Issuers should also be cautious of providers that treat public company communications exactly like ordinary consumer advertising. Promotional communications still need to remain consistent with securities laws, exchange requirements, and the issuer’s publicly disclosed information.
Practical Investor Relations Due-Diligence Checklist
Before appointing a provider, consider whether you can answer yes to the following:
- Public-company experience: Does the team have recent, verifiable experience with listed issuers?
- Exchange familiarity: Does it understand the environment in which your company operates?
- Strategic capability: Can it translate your corporate strategy and milestones into a coherent investor narrative?
- Content resources: Are its writing, design, video and digital-production capabilities appropriate for your needs?
- Distribution: Can the provider clearly explain where content will be distributed and why those audiences are relevant?
- Measurement: Are campaign KPIs, reporting frequency and optimization processes defined?
- Compliance workflow: Is there a clear approval process, and does the provider understand the limits of its role?
- Evidence: Are case studies, testimonials and independent reviews attributable and current?
- Geographic coverage: Can the team support the markets and time zones relevant to your investors?
- Responsiveness: Are account-management expectations and response times clear?
- Commercial terms: Are scope, costs, contract duration and additional fees transparent?
- Claims: Does the provider avoid guarantees relating to investor demand, valuation or share-price performance?
Where Global One Media Group Fits Within This Landscape
Global One Media Group was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Singapore. It is an investor marketing and digital communications firm providing investor relations communications support to publicly traded and pre-IPO companies across North America, Europe, and Asia.
Global One Media acts as an extension of clients’ investor relations and marketing teams, combining investment story development, strategic messaging, premium content production, digital marketing, and targeted multi-platform distribution through an international in-house team.
Its capabilities include corporate messaging, investor narrative development, investor-focused content, executive interviews, video production, social media management, digital advertising, website development, branding, investor webinars, and performance reporting. More information about these capabilities is available on the company’s Services page.
Global One Media supports companies listed on exchanges internationally, with particular experience supporting issuers listed on Canadian exchanges including the TSX, TSX Venture Exchange, and CSE, as well as companies trading on U.S. markets including Nasdaq, NYSE, and OTC Markets.
The Group is not a brokerage, investment adviser, legal adviser, or capital-raising firm. Its role is to support investor communications and digital market visibility while clients retain responsibility for their regulatory obligations and work with their own legal and professional advisers where required.
Companies conducting due diligence can also review Global One Media’s About page, Case Studies, Client Reviews, and FAQ Page for further information about its capabilities and previous client work.
Examples From Global One Media Client Work
Because this guide is published by Global One Media, the following examples are drawn from the Group’s own client engagements. They are included to illustrate communications approaches and results, rather than as independent assessments of the companies or their investment performance.
Arianne Phosphate: Communicating a Technical Investment Story
Global One Media’s Arianne Phosphate case study provides a recent example of investor communications for a Canadian-listed company with a technically complex story.
Arianne Phosphate joined Global One Media’s six-month investor marketing program in mid-February 2026. The campaign focused on turning a technical phosphate narrative into a clearer, repeatable investor story and connecting the Lac à Paul Project with broader themes including food security, fertilizer supply, LFP batteries, purified phosphoric acid, and secure Western supply chains.
Over the six-month program, the campaign expanded from narrative development and executive interviews into social media management, investor panels, international distribution, EDM campaigns, a website redesign, and investor webinars. Content was distributed through Stocks To Watch, investorTV, SmallCap Asia, Nordic Funds, and StockTA, giving investors multiple ways to engage with the company’s story across different markets.
Across the program, Arianne Phosphate’s featured interviews, panel and webinar generated more than 185,000 combined views. From mid-February through mid-August 2026, Facebook generated 291,014 views and reached 71,491 viewers, while LinkedIn recorded 63,952 impressions and 952 reactions.
The case study illustrates an important due-diligence consideration for issuers with complex businesses: whether a communications provider can preserve technical substance while building a consistent investor narrative across content, digital channels, and international distribution.
Alta Copper: Combining Branding, Content, and Digital Distribution
Global One Media’s Alta Copper case study covers an engagement from May 2023 to July 2024 involving rebranding, investor-focused content, executive video and digital distribution.
During that period, the published case study reports a 4,500% increase in Facebook impressions, an 8,900% increase in reach, a 1,700% increase in content interactions and a 3,800% increase in link clicks. It also reports that one video interview reached the first page of Google results for the search phrase “copper stock 2024.”
Alta Copper Executive Chair Giulio Bonifacio has also provided a publicly attributed testimonial regarding Global One Media’s work on the company’s branding, investor presentation, video interviews and social media content. The testimonial appears in the Alta Copper case study.
Choosing the Right Investor Relations Partner
Investor relations providers can differ substantially in strategy, capabilities, audience access, and operating model. Due diligence should therefore focus less on promotional claims and more on evidence: who will do the work, how the provider develops and distributes communications, how results are measured, and whether its processes are appropriate for a public company environment.
For Canadian issuers, geographic location should be part of that assessment rather than the deciding factor. Experience with the relevant capital markets, understanding of disclosure requirements, execution quality, investor-audience reach, and responsiveness may provide a more useful basis for evaluating fit.
Companies considering investor marketing and digital communications support can explore Global One Media’s Services and Case Studies or contact the Global One Media team to discuss their communications requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should a public company look for in an investor relations firm?
Look for relevant public-company experience, strategic communications expertise, strong production capabilities, credible distribution, transparent reporting, knowledge of the issuer’s disclosure environment, verifiable client evidence, and responsive account support.
The right fit depends on the issuer’s objectives. A company that primarily requires shareholder communications may need a different provider from one seeking a broader digital investor marketing program.
Does a Canadian public company need to appoint a Canada-based investor relations firm?
No. A provider’s location alone does not determine whether it is appropriate.
Canadian issuers should also consider the provider’s experience with the relevant exchange and disclosure environment, quality of execution, investor reach, responsiveness, geographic coverage, and ability to work effectively with management and professional advisers.
What is the difference between investor relations communications and investment advice?
Investor relations communications help a company communicate corporate information, strategy, and its investment story to the market.
Investment advice involves recommendations or advice concerning securities and may be subject to separate regulatory requirements. An investor communications provider should not be treated as a broker, legal adviser, or investment adviser unless it is separately qualified and authorized to provide those services.
Can an investor relations firm guarantee investor interest or share-price performance?
No communications provider can control investor demand, valuation, or share-price performance.
Companies should instead assess measurable communications outcomes such as content quality, reach, engagement, video views, website performance, audience development, and other clearly defined KPIs.
Who is responsible for compliance when an outside investor relations provider is used?
The issuer remains responsible for complying with applicable securities laws and exchange requirements.
External communications providers can support the issuer’s communications and approval processes, but they do not replace management, legal counsel or regulatory advisers. Requirements differ depending on the issuer and its listing, including those under TSX, TSXV, and CSE policies.
Should investor relations performance be judged by share-price movement?
Share-price movement should not be treated as a direct measure of communications performance because securities prices are affected by many factors outside an investor relations provider’s control.
More appropriate communications measures can include reach, engagement, content consumption, website activity, audience development, video views, and other campaign KPIs.
Disclaimer
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, financial, or investment advice. Public companies should consult their own legal, regulatory, and other professional advisers regarding their specific circumstances and obligations.
Two Doors West: Why Asian Investors Are Looking to US and Canadian Stock Markets
Key Takeaways:
- Asian investors made a net purchase of more than $128 billion in US stocks in 2025, according to a BNP Paribas report on US Treasury data.
- Singapore investors hold roughly 39% of their portfolios in Singapore stocks, even though Singapore makes up just 0.4% of global equity indices.
- Two markets stand out for Asian capital heading west: US exchanges for scale and technology, Canadian exchanges for mining and resources.
Staying close to home has traditionally felt like the safer choice for many Asian investors. However, the numbers are showing that this is starting to change.
The Number That Started It
According to a report from BNP Paribas cited in the South China Morning Post, Asian investors made net purchases of more than $128 billion in US stocks in 2025. Though the pace slowed in the back half of the year, the same BNP Paribas report shows that the fourth quarter alone accounted for $23 billion of that total.
This suggests a broader pattern: Asian investors are venturing into the US stock market. And it appears that the US is not the only destination. A second market, one built around resources rather than technology, deserves the same look.
Breaking a Habit
This $128 billion figure matters because of the investing habits that came before it.
A long-cited industry statistic states that on average, Singaporean investors keep about 39% of their portfolios in Singapore stocks even though they represent only 0.4% of global equity indices. According to economists, this is called home bias, and it is common not only in Singapore but across Asia as well. That is to say, historically, investors across Asia have leaned toward what is familiar to them—local banks, telecoms, and property names.
While this might be comfortable, investors are also starting to realize that by staying in a market that makes up less than half a percent of the world’s listed companies, they miss out on the great growth stories and diversification that a much bigger market can offer. The $128 billion flowing into US stocks in 2025 suggests that more investors are starting to act on this realization.
Why Now Despite the Noise? Why Now Despite the Noise?
This shift is not happening in calm conditions. In June 2026, Vice Chairman of Moelis & Company, Eric Cantor, pointed to the rising interest from Asian investors in US assets. His comments came amid ongoing US-China trade tensions.
This detail matters because it shows that investors might be deciding that scale, liquidity, and sector depth are worth navigating through some friction. Whether this calculation holds up will depend on how trade relations develop, but the flows so far suggest that investors are not waiting to find out.
As Asian investors look beyond their home markets, understanding how different Western exchanges work becomes increasingly important. SmallCap Asia has published practical guides to accessing both US and Canadian stocks, providing useful context on the opportunities and considerations associated with each market.
Door 1: The US Markets
When Asian investors think of the US stock market, they usually think of one of three places: The New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, or the over-the-counter market.
The distinction matters. Nasdaq provides deep exposure to technology and growth companies, while the NYSE is home to many established companies across financials, industrials, energy, healthcare, and other sectors. OTC securities offer another route into the US market, but they can come with lower liquidity, less information available, and greater risk than securities listed on major exchanges.
Entering the market is no longer difficult since most major brokers across Singapore, Hong Kong, and the wider region now offer some level of US market access. Instead, investors are more concerned with whether their broker supports their desired ticker, if the currency conversion is favorable, and how US dividend withholding tax affects their returns.
Door 2: Canadian Markets
The second door gets less attention, but it opens into a very different part of the global equity market.
Canada is home to roughly 40% of the world’s public mining companies listed across the Toronto Stock Exchange and the TSX Venture Exchange. The market is especially relevant for investors interested in gold, copper, uranium, lithium, or other critical minerals. For Asian investors seeking resource exposure, this provides access to a large number of publicly traded mining companies.
There are also important differences between Canada’s major exchanges. The TSX generally hosts larger and more established companies, while the TSX-V focuses more on earlier-stage and growth companies, including junior miners and explorers. The CSE provides another market for entrepreneurial and emerging issuers.
What Both Doors Have in Common
Whichever door an investor walks through, the same checklist applies.
- Currency Exposure. US stocks trade in USD, Canadian stocks in CAD. In both cases, returns are affected by how that currency moves against the investor’s home currency.
- Withholding Tax. The US generally withholds 30% on dividends paid to non-residents, although applicable tax treaties may provide a reduced rate for investors in certain countries. Canada generally withholds 25%, which is reduced to 15% for eligible Singapore residents under the Canada-Singapore tax treaty.
- Time Zone. Both markets trade while most of Asia is asleep. This affects how quickly an investor can react to news or sudden price movements.
- Broker Access. Different brokers support different tickers, so investors will find it worthwhile to confirm the stock on their platform instead of assuming it is available.
None of the above are reasons to avoid either the US or the Canadian markets. They are simply the cost of admission.
Asian investors enter the Western stock market through two different doors, and there are different reasons to walk through them. The US offers scale and deep exposure to sectors such as technology, while Canada provides a particularly deep public market for mining. What is common is that Asian investors are becoming more comfortable venturing a little farther from their home market to find what it can offer.
Why Institutional Investors Are Doubling Down on Crypto in 2026
Key Takeaways:
- Institutional interest in crypto remains strong. In a Coinbase and EY-Parthenon survey, 73% of respondents said they plan to increase their digital-asset allocations in 2026, even as many adopt stricter risk controls.
- Institutional exposure is visible in public filings. Regulatory disclosures identify major holders of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Millennium Management.
- Even the biggest corporate Bitcoin holder slowed its pace. Strategy reported no Bitcoin purchases for one week in March 2026, its first weekly pause of the year.
- Institutional interest is also extending beyond Bitcoin to other cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and tokenized assets.
Yes, With Conditions
Seventy-three percent of institutional investors told Coinbase and EY-Parthenon, in a January 2026 survey of 351 institutional decision-makers, that they plan to increase their digital-asset allocations this year. Alongside that, 74% expect crypto prices to rise over the next 12 months, while two-thirds report exposure through spot crypto ETFs or exchange-traded products (ETPs).
That appetite for more crypto, though, comes with a catch: 49% of respondents said recent volatility had led their firms to place greater emphasis on risk management, liquidity, and position sizing. As David Duong, Head of Institutional Research at Coinbase, told CoinDesk, “People are still interested in crypto. They want to see tighter risk controls, but they want to stay allocated.”
That same caution appears in how institutions are sizing their allocations. The proportion of surveyed firms allocating more than 5% of their assets under management to digital assets is expected to rise from 18% to 29% by the end of 2026. Interestingly, the largest institutions are also the most cautious: 64% of firms managing between $501 billion and $1 trillion plan to increase their holdings, compared with 77% of firms managing between $1 billion and $50 billion, according to the Coinbase and EY-Parthenon survey.
Advertisement: Account numbers and personal details can sit well outside the area you intended to capture. SnagitPro explains how to prepare financial screenshots for sharing, with a separate exported copy and a final check before release.
A separate 2026 survey from Nomura and Laser Digital adds another perspective. The survey gathered responses from 518 investment professionals in Japan, including representatives of institutional investors, family offices, and public-sector organizations. Among respondents considering a digital-asset allocation over the next three years, nearly 80% planned to invest, while 60% expected to allocate between 2% and less than 5% of their portfolios.
Across the surveys, the pattern is similar. Many institutions appear to be approaching crypto as a longer-term allocation rather than a quick trade.
Follow the Paperwork: Who Is Actually Buying?
Survey answers are one thing, and regulatory filings are another. Together, they provide a clearer view of institutional exposure.
Under U.S. rules, institutional investment managers that meet certain thresholds must disclose specified equity holdings each quarter through documents called 13F filings. Second-quarter 2026 filings identify major holders of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF, or IBIT, including Jane Street, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Millennium Management.
As of June 30, 2026, Jane Street reported an IBIT position valued at approximately $828 million, followed by Wells Fargo at approximately $812 million. Goldman Sachs reported approximately $574 million, while Morgan Stanley and Millennium Management reported approximately $549 million and $322 million, respectively. These positions can change significantly from one quarter to the next, but the filings provide concrete evidence of institutional participation.
Beyond institutional funds, access has widened for retail investors as well. Vanguard began allowing clients to trade certain third-party crypto ETFs and mutual funds, while Merrill Lynch expanded the ability of its advisors to recommend select crypto products. Morgan Stanley also announced plans to introduce direct cryptocurrency trading through its E*Trade platform.
These are meaningful steps for firms that had previously taken a cautious approach to digital assets. Separately, Bitfinex analysts projected that total assets under management in crypto ETFs could reach $400 billion by the end of 2026, with products tracking assets such as Solana and XRP broadening a market previously dominated by Bitcoin and Ethereum funds.
Taken together, regulated funds have become a major entry point into crypto. Retail interest has not disappeared, but many institutional investors increasingly prefer the familiar structure, compliance requirements, and investor protections offered by registered vehicles.
The Biggest Bitcoin Buyer Hits Pause
Beneath the fund flows, corporate treasuries, the cash and other reserve assets businesses keep on their balance sheets, tell a messier story worth watching.
Strategy, the software company formerly known as MicroStrategy, remains the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin. As of March 22, 2026, it held 762,099 BTC acquired for approximately $57.69 billion, at an average purchase price of $75,694 per coin. With Bitcoin trading below that average at the time, the position was approximately $6.2 billion below its acquisition cost.
Strategy then reported no purchases for the week of March 23 to March 29, its first weekly pause of 2026. However, the pause did not signal a broader retreat. The company resumed buying the following week, acquiring another 4,871 BTC between April 1 and April 5, according to a subsequent SEC filing.
The wider corporate-treasury trend also reflected greater caution. In February 2026, public companies added approximately 7,800 BTC and sold or otherwise reduced their reported holdings by roughly 8,600 BTC. This produced a net decline of approximately 800 BTC, the first monthly net reduction recorded by the cited tracker. Strategy alone accounted for approximately 65% of the Bitcoin added by public-company treasuries that month.
Strategy is not the only public company holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset, only the biggest. Semler Scientific, a U.S. healthcare-technology company, adopted Bitcoin as its primary treasury reserve asset in May 2024. Japan-based Metaplanet adopted a similar strategy that year and has since become one of the most prominent corporate Bitcoin holders outside the United States.
None of this means companies are giving up on Bitcoin treasuries. It means the trend is growing up, moving past the phase when buying more was necessarily the obvious next step.
Beyond Bitcoin: Stablecoins, Other Cryptocurrencies, and Tokenization
Beyond corporate balance sheets, institutional interest is not staying limited to Bitcoin.
The proportion of surveyed institutions holding cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin and Ethereum is expected to rise from 51% to 56% in 2026, with Solana, Chainlink, and XRP among the leading assets driving that increase. Even so, Bitcoin and Ethereum remain much more widely held, appearing in 91% and 90% of surveyed portfolios, respectively.
Within that shift, stablecoins have seen one of the more interesting changes. A stablecoin is a cryptocurrency designed to maintain a relatively stable value, typically by being tied to an asset such as the U.S. dollar. This can make stablecoins useful for payments, settlements, and transfers without the price swings associated with Bitcoin.
In the Coinbase and EY-Parthenon research, 85% of respondents said they already use or are interested in using stablecoins. Internal cash management and money movement, along with same-day securities settlement, were among the leading potential uses identified by respondents.
The survey also found that U.S. respondents viewed the GENIUS Act, a 2025 law that established a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, as a potential catalyst for wider institutional and corporate adoption.
Further out, tokenization is still taking shape. It involves representing ownership of a real-world asset, such as a stock, bond, or piece of real estate, through a digital token recorded on a blockchain. Sixty-three percent of investors surveyed by Coinbase and EY-Parthenon said they were interested in allocating to tokenized assets, while 61% expected tokenization to significantly affect trading, clearing, and settlement over the next three to five years.
Separately, Broadridge’s 2025 Tokenization Survey found that 63% of custodians already offer tokenized assets, compared with 15% of asset managers, although another 41% of asset managers plan to launch tokenized products.
What It Adds Up To
None of this means every institution is following the same playbook. Taken as a whole, however, the 2026 data shows a market moving from experimentation toward infrastructure: regulated products, tighter risk controls, and identifiable institutional holders are becoming more prominent alongside the retail activity that drove earlier crypto cycles.
For small- and mid-cap companies, what matters is less where Bitcoin’s price sits on any given day and more what this shift signals: many large investors are becoming more comfortable treating crypto as a portfolio allocation rather than a novelty. That is a different environment from five years ago and one worth understanding, whether or not digital assets ever appear on a company’s own balance sheet.
For small- and mid-cap companies determining how, or whether, to discuss digital assets with investors, Global One Media can help translate complex market shifts into clear, accessible investor communications. Get in touch with us to learn how we can help your organization.
7 Free Stock Technical Analysis Tools Worth Using in 2026
Key Takeaways:
- Free technical analysis tools vary widely. Some are designed for chart customization, while others focus on screening, market breadth, or automated interpretation.
- StockTA turns multiple indicators into clear short-, mid-, and long-term technical summaries without requiring paid subscription. Registration is free.
- TradingView is a strong choice for interactive charting, while FINVIZ and Barchart are useful for screening large groups of stocks.
- No technical signal is conclusive. Investors should compare timeframes, confirm signals, and use technical analysis alongside broader due diligence.
Technical analysis can be as simple as checking whether a stock is trading above its moving average or as detailed as comparing momentum, volume, volatility, candlestick patterns, and support and resistance across multiple timeframes.
The challenge is not finding indicators. It is finding a platform that presents the right information clearly without putting its most useful features behind a subscription.
Technical analysis studies market-generated data to estimate the probable future direction of prices. It deals in probabilities, not guarantees. The best platform, therefore, is not necessarily the one with the most indicators. It is the one that helps you interpret relevant data efficiently and apply it consistently.
The following seven free stock technical analysis tools cover different needs, from automated trend summaries and stock screening to customizable charts and market breadth analysis.
Free Stock Technical Analysis Tools at a Glance
| Tool | Best for | Notable free features | Main limitation |
| StockTA | Fast, automated technical interpretation | Multi-timeframe summaries, support and resistance, indicators, candlestick recognition, technical screeners | Less manual chart customization than advanced charting platforms |
| TradingView | Interactive charts and customization | Drawing tools, community indicators, watchlist, screeners, two indicators per chart | Free plan includes ads and tighter chart and indicator limits |
| FINVIZ | Visual market screening | Stock screener, heatmaps, charts, technical filters, preset signals | Advanced real-time tools and customization require Elite |
| StockCharts | Classical charting and market breadth | SharpCharts, Point & Figure charts, GalleryView, CandleGlance, market dashboards | Saving, advanced scans, and alerts require membership |
| Investing.com | Multi-asset technical snapshots | Technical summaries, moving averages, indicators, pivot points, multiple timeframes | Interface can feel crowded, and some personalization requires an account |
| Barchart | Detailed stock screening | More than 150 screener data points, sample screeners, FlipCharts, watchlists | Some data is delayed, and advanced alerts require a paid plan |
| Yahoo Finance | Combining charts with company research | Interactive charts, indicators, drawing tools, news, fundamentals, stock screener | Technical workflow is less specialized than dedicated charting platforms |
1. StockTA: Best for Automated Technical Interpretation
StockTA is designed for investors who want technical information without having to configure every chart or calculate each level manually. Enter a supported stock or ETF ticker, and the platform automatically generates a technical overview.
Its Technical Summary consolidates indicator data into short-, mid-, and long-term bullish or bearish readings. The platform also calculates primary, secondary, and tertiary support and resistance levels, identifies candlestick patterns, and displays commonly used indicators such as RSI, MACD, stochastic oscillators, moving averages, and volume trends.
StockTA also includes preconfigured technical screeners for conditions such as:
- Overbought and oversold readings
- Golden crosses
- Volume breakouts
- Bullish technical patterns
- Candlestick pattern matches
This automated approach is StockTA’s main differentiator. Many platforms give traders the charting components but leave them to draw levels and interpret several indicators individually. StockTA processes those inputs and presents a more digestible view immediately.
The platform is fully ad-supported and accessible by registering for a free account. It does not require a paid subscription or software installation and has no restrictive ticker-search limit. It covers tens of thousands of securities across major exchanges, including the NYSE, Nasdaq, AMEX, TSX, and TSX Venture Exchange.
StockTA was founded in 1999 and is being modernized with an upgraded interface, user accounts, saved preferences and watchlists, and expanded educational content through the StockTA Podcast. Planned development also includes crypto coverage and additional premium stock-screening features, while its core tools remain freely accessible.
“When choosing a technical analysis platform, traders should look for tools that cut through market noise and deliver clear, objective signals without requiring hours of manual charting. StockTA simplifies research by instantly processing complex price data, support/resistance levels, and indicator trends into clear actionable insights, helping traders spend less time drawing lines and more time making informed decisions.”
— Kevin Steuer, Managing Partner of StockTA.com
Best for: Beginners, swing traders, and time-constrained investors who want a fast technical read before conducting deeper research.
What to consider: StockTA emphasizes automated interpretation. Traders who want extensive drawing tools, custom scripts, or highly personalized chart layouts may prefer to use it alongside a more customizable charting platform.
2. TradingView: Best for Customizable Interactive Charts
TradingView is one of the most flexible options for traders who prefer to work directly with charts. Its browser, desktop, and mobile platforms provide multiple chart types, a large indicator library, screeners, drawing tools, watchlists, and a community where users publish market ideas and custom scripts.
TradingView’s free Basic plan is permanent and does not require a credit card. According to its current plan comparison, it includes one chart per tab, one saved chart layout, two indicators per chart, a 30-symbol watchlist, and access to historical daily data. Users can also explore its drawing tools and Pine Script environment.
Best for: Traders who value hands-on charting, custom indicators, and an active market community.
What to consider: The free plan includes advertising and limits how many indicators and charts can be used at once. The platform’s depth can also create a steeper learning curve for beginners who want a quick interpretation rather than a blank analytical canvas.
3. FINVIZ: Best for Visual Stock Screening
FINVIZ is particularly useful for moving from the broad market to a focused list of potential setups. Its free stock screener lets users filter companies by descriptive, fundamental, and technical criteria. Traders can screen for moving-average relationships, performance, volatility, relative volume, chart patterns, and other conditions.
FINVIZ is also known for its market heatmaps, which make it easy to see how sectors, industries, and individual stocks are performing at a glance. This visual approach is helpful for spotting where momentum or weakness is concentrated before opening individual charts.
Best for: Traders who want to scan the U.S. market quickly and identify candidates for further analysis.
What to consider: The free version is supported by ads and does not include the full real-time, customization, alerting, and export capabilities of FINVIZ Elite. The Elite plan is currently listed at $39.50 per month when billed monthly after its trial.
4. StockCharts: Best for Classical Charting and Market Breadth
StockCharts has long focused on chart-based market analysis. Its free tools include SharpCharts, an interactive Advanced Charting Platform, Point & Figure charts, Symbol Summary, seasonality charts, GalleryView, and CandleGlance.
GalleryView displays one security across several timeframes, while CandleGlance places multiple mini-charts side by side. These formats can help traders compare short-, intermediate-, and long-term conditions or review several securities without opening them individually.
StockCharts also offers a detailed Market Summary dashboard covering major indexes, U.S. sectors, breadth, sentiment, volatility, intermarket relationships, and selected economic indicators.
Best for: Investors who use classical charting methods or want to study market breadth, sector leadership, and longer-term trends.
What to consider: Free users can access a useful set of charts, but saving charts, running custom scans, and setting automatic alerts require a paid membership. Paid plans begin at $19.95 per month.
5. Investing.com: Best for Multi-Asset Technical Snapshots
Investing.com’s technical analysis hub covers more than stocks. It brings together technical readings for indexes, futures, commodities, currencies, and other instruments, making it useful for traders who monitor several asset classes.
Its Technical Summary combines moving averages and indicators into buy, sell, or neutral readings across multiple timeframes. Users can also review technical indicators, candlestick patterns, and pivot points.
Best for: Investors who want quick technical readings across global markets and several asset classes.
What to consider: The site contains a large amount of news, analysis, advertising, and promotional content, so the interface may feel crowded. Some customized views and saved settings also require an account.
6. Barchart: Best for Detailed Screening and Signal Discovery
Barchart combines market data, charts, screeners, performance lists, heatmaps, and technical trading signals. Its free Stocks Screener supports more than 150 data points and lets users filter securities using technical, fundamental, performance, and descriptive criteria.
The screener also provides sample templates, shareable results, downloadable data, and FlipCharts for paging through the charts behind a result set. A free account can save one custom screener, while paid memberships expand saving and alert options.
Barchart supports U.S., Canadian, U.K., Australian, and European market views. Its site notes that U.S. stock data is generally delayed by 15 to 20 minutes, although Cboe BZX data is real time.
Best for: Investors who want granular screening criteria and a structured way to move from a large universe to a technical watchlist.
What to consider: Data timing varies by market, and automated screener emails and some advanced workflow features require a paid membership.
7. Yahoo Finance: Best for Technical Charts in a Broader Research Workflow
Yahoo Finance is not a technical-analysis-only platform, but its familiarity and breadth make it a practical starting point. An interactive stock chart can display indicators, technical overlays, corporate events, comparisons, and drawing tools alongside price and volume.
Yahoo Finance also provides company profiles, financial statements, news, earnings information, analyst estimates, and portfolio tools. Its free equity screener offers more than 150 criteria, helping users connect chart observations with company and market context.
Best for: Investors who want technical charts, company information, and market news in one familiar place.
What to consider: The technical workflow is less specialized than StockTA, TradingView, or StockCharts. Traders who need automated pattern interpretation or advanced chart management may outgrow it.
How to Choose the Right Free Technical Analysis Tool
There is no single best tool for every investor. Start with the job you want the platform to perform:
- For an immediate interpretation: Use StockTA to review trend direction, support and resistance, candlestick patterns, and multiple timeframes without configuring a chart.
- For manual chart work: Use TradingView for customizable charts, drawing tools, and community-built indicators.
- For finding possible setups: Use FINVIZ or Barchart to screen a large market by technical conditions.
- For market breadth and classical methods: Use StockCharts to compare sectors, indexes, and several timeframes.
- For cross-asset monitoring: Use Investing.com to compare technical conditions beyond equities.
- For an all-in-one research starting point: Use Yahoo Finance to place charts beside news and company fundamentals.
Many investors will benefit from using two complementary platforms. A screener can identify a candidate, an automated summary can make its technical condition easier to understand, and a customizable chart can help verify the setup in more detail.
Free Does Not Mean Risk-Free
Technical indicators summarize historical price, volume, and market behavior. They do not know what will happen next. Signals can conflict across timeframes, breakouts can fail, and low-volume securities can produce noisy or misleading patterns.
FINRA notes that momentum investors use indicators based on price and volume to assess whether a trend may continue, but identifying market peaks and troughs remains difficult.
Investors should treat technical analysis as one input, not a substitute for understanding a company, reviewing its disclosures, and managing risk. The SEC’s Investor.gov provides guidance on using company filings for investment research, while FINRA offers additional due-diligence considerations.
Start with a Clearer Technical View
The best free stock technical analysis tool is the one that fits your process and helps you evaluate data consistently.
For traders who want immediate, multi-timeframe interpretation without a paywall or complicated setup, explore StockTA and enter a ticker to review its technical summary, support and resistance levels, key indicators, candlestick patterns, and related screener signals.
Investor Webinars: Are They Worth Your Time?
Key Takeaways:
- Investor webinars are an increasingly common communication tool between investors and companies as the shift to online spaces has become more prominent.
- Investor webinars should be used selectively, not passively. Investors need to engage with them critically, while companies must approach them with clarity and responsibility.
The shift to digital accelerated during and after COVID-19, and the investing world has embraced it fully. As online habits, from social media to virtual events, have become embedded in everyday life, investors and public companies now connect, engage, and build communities in a largely digital financial landscape.
One example is the rise of investor webinars: online forums where participants can tune in to hear industry leaders discuss emerging trends and pressing issues shaping both markets and the broader global economy. These informative sessions, often hosted by companies, brokers, and analysts, aim to share insights and provide more direct access to industry and company perspectives.
But with their growing popularity, an important question remains: do these webinars genuinely offer valuable insight, or are they simply adding to the noise?
Measuring the Return: Value for Investors and Companies
Access is one of the key reasons investor webinars appeal to participants. By joining an online session, investors can gain exposure to market outlook presentations tailored to their interests, ranging from macroeconomic trends to sector-specific insights. Many webinars also feature live Q&A segments, allowing participants to engage directly with speakers.
Other benefits of investor webinars for investors include:
- In-depth breakdowns of company performance and portfolios
- Low-cost or free participation
- Early exposure to emerging market themes and narratives
For companies, webinars provide a way to reach a broader and more diverse audience than traditional investor conferences. With no geographical constraints, investor webinars can attract participants from anywhere.
These sessions also offer companies a platform to communicate their strategy, performance, and outlook directly to investors, helping to build credibility when done well and consistently. For companies, investor webinars can be a cost-efficient tool for enhancing visibility and strengthening investor engagement.
The Challenges of Investor Webinars
Like any communication format, investor webinars deliver the most value when they are approached with clear objectives and thoughtful structure. Investors who rely on them as a primary source of information may end up with a narrower, less rigorous understanding compared to formal research. There’s also the risk of overreliance on curated perspectives or recycled insights that offer little new value.
For companies, poorly differentiated webinars can simply add to the existing noise online, especially when the content is repetitive or lacks meaningful depth. If a webinar isn’t structured to allow sufficient time for in-depth discussion, it often results in only a surface-level understanding of a company’s portfolio, making it a less effective use of time for investors and companies alike.
These challenges can be addressed through focused agendas, credible speakers, balanced discussions, and sufficient time for meaningful Q&A. By tailoring each session to a defined audience and delivering clear, relevant takeaways, companies can create webinars that stand out and provide value beyond a standard corporate presentation. Webinars can also be complemented by specialized long-form interviews, which give company leaders and industry experts more time to explore technical subjects, corporate strategy, and project developments in greater depth.
Worth It or Not?
Webinars are useful but not universally valuable. Their effectiveness depends largely on the context and the purpose behind them.
For investors, webinars are best treated as a valuable supplement rather than a primary source of research when evaluating market trends or understanding project fundamentals. For those seeking a broad understanding of market trends, general webinars can be highly accessible and informative. However, for more technical topics, such as interpreting mineral resource estimates, investors may gain deeper insight from long-form interviews, where company leaders and experts have more time to explain project developments in detail.
From a company’s perspective, the impact of a webinar is only as strong as the quality of its content. The most effective companies take a thoughtful, omnichannel approach that identifies which digital strategies drive the strongest engagement and outcomes.
By understanding their audience and delivering relevant, well-structured insights, companies can position webinars as a meaningful communication tool rather than just another piece of content. Pairing webinars with long-form interviews can further strengthen this approach by moving audiences from broad industry discussions to deeper, company-specific insights.
The value of investor webinars becomes clear when they are used strategically by both investors and companies. Quality, credibility, and intent determine whether these online discussions inform or simply overwhelm.
Through investorTV, Global One Media puts this approach into practice by bringing together public company executives, industry leaders, and market experts for focused discussions and long-form interviews. Together, these formats give investors both broader market context and deeper access to the companies and developments shaping the market.
Global One Media Featured in International Business Times Singapore on Cross-Border Investor Visibility
Singapore continues to strengthen its role as a strategic connector between Western public markets and Asian investor audiences. According to the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s Asset Management Survey 2024, Singapore’s assets under management grew 12% to S$6.1 trillion in 2024, while alternative assets under management rose 14%, supported by growth across private equity, venture capital, and hedge fund managers.
This growth reinforces why Singapore has become an important regional hub for capital, investor engagement, and cross-border financial visibility. It is also central to the strategy of Global One Media, which uses Singapore as a strategic base for helping Canadian, North American-listed, and international public companies communicate more effectively with Asian investor audiences.
Bridging the gap between international public companies and regional investors is central to the work of Bastien Boulay, Founder and CEO of Global One Media. Boulay recently discussed this shift in an International Business Times Singapore article on why Singapore functions as a strategic connector between Western public markets and Asian investor audiences.
“The traditional model of public market outreach was engineered for domestic regulatory compliance rather than cross-border asset accessibility,” Boulay said. “When an enterprise listed in Toronto or New York attempts to engage sophisticated capital allocators in Asia, standard text-heavy filings fail to communicate the underlying operational narrative. Our focus centers on translating corporate data into highly precise, digitally native formats that allow regional financial networks to evaluate international assets with absolute clarity.”
That point reflects a broader shift in investor communication. Public companies can no longer rely only on filings, investor decks, and broad global distribution if they want to reach audiences across Asia. The operational necessity of localized institutional communication is increasing as regional markets become more connected and investors consume information through digital platforms, video, mobile content, and specialized financial media.
According to Boulay, maintaining continuous market presence across these systems requires a more regional approach. “The interconnected architecture of modern Asian financial networks means that standard international broadcasting techniques are no longer effective,” Boulay stated. “Utilizing an active, localized corporate voice via platforms like SmallCap Asia functions as a clear proof of concept, granting international public companies an authentic, continuous foothold inside an integrated capital ecosystem.”
Platforms such as SmallCap Asia support this regional strategy by giving international issuers a more localized channel for market education, executive visibility, and digital investor engagement. Rather than relying only on detached global broadcasts, companies can build a more consistent presence inside the markets they want to reach.
For Canadian and North American-listed companies, as well as international public companies looking toward Asia, Singapore offers more than geographic convenience. It provides regulatory credibility, regional connectivity, and access to sophisticated capital networks.
As cross-border investor communication becomes more important, visibility is no longer just about publishing information. It is about making that information understandable, accessible, and relevant to the right audience. Global One Media’s strategy reflects that shift.
7 Best Practices to Make Your Company’s Facebook Presence Stand Out
In this article, you will:
- Explore what makes Facebook marketing unique
- Learn how to engage and connect with your investor base on Facebook
- Understand why Facebook marketing can be a powerful tool for business growth
Who doesn’t have Facebook these days?
With over 3 billion people logging in every month, including nearly 280 million in the U.S. alone, Facebook isn’t just another social platform; it’s part of modern culture.
As the #1 social network worldwide as of 2025, it gives companies a direct line to millions of potential customers, making it a valuable tool for getting your message seen and heard.
What clicks on Facebook?
Marketing is never one-size-fits-all. What resonates on YouTube might not work on Facebook, and vice versa. That’s because each platform has its own flavor: its own audience behavior, content style, and expectations.
On Facebook, people value content they find informative and authentic. Successful Facebook content strikes a balance: it should be accurate and aligned with your company’s messaging while also being engaging enough to stand out in a crowded feed.
To help you get started, here are seven practical approaches you can use to make the most of your Facebook marketing and connect meaningfully with your investor base.
#1. Curate Your Company’s Profile
Your Facebook profile is often the first stop for people checking out your company. Making it look credible, approachable, and consistent with your website helps build trust from the get-go.
Start with a concise company overview, supported by cohesive visuals that create a strong Facebook presence. Be sure to include all key details on your About page, such as the projects in your portfolio and a link to your company’s website.
#2. Know Your People
Social media marketing thrives on connection, and it’s no different on Facebook. Fortunately, Facebook offers many tools to make sure you’re plugged into the right community.
Define your Core Audience using demographics, location, interests, behaviours, and connections. Saving this in Meta Ads Manager can help you create customer-centric content.
Custom Audiences help you reconnect with people who have interacted with your profile or website. They can be built automatically with the Facebook pixel or SDK, depending on your setup.
Lookalike Audiences can help expand your network and reach people likely to become new investors. By creating a source audience, your Facebook ads can reach people with common interests or behaviours.
#3. Go Back to the Basics
Before starting your marketing campaign, you must know what your objectives are. Are you trying to build awareness for your company? Or are you trying to increase engagement? Each campaign should have a clear goal, and the best way to achieve it is by tailoring your content to that purpose.
Once your goals are set, make your campaign stand out with the right creative approach. Whether it’s sharp, concise copy or high-quality visuals, ensure that your elements are consistent with your company’s image. Always include a strong call-to-action at the end of your caption to encourage your audience to keep engaging with your brand.
#4. Use Boosted Ads and Meta Ads
Facebook, as part of Meta, offers two main options for increasing the visibility of your marketing campaign: boosted posts and Meta ads.
Boosted posts are existing Page posts promoted through the Meta Business Suite. They’re quick to set up, can run on a schedule or continuously, and focus on simple goals such as likes, comments, shares, or brand awareness on Facebook.
Meanwhile, Meta ads, created in Ads Manager or Business Suite, offer more advanced targeting and customization. They can optimize for installs, conversions, or video views and appear across Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp, and the Meta Audience Network.
In short, boosted posts are easy and engagement-focused, while Meta ads are flexible and goal-driven.
#5. Chat with Messenger Business
Another powerful feature on Facebook is Messenger Business, which helps you build trust and strengthen investor relationships through direct conversations.
With Messenger Business, you can access free tools such as greetings, quick replies, and tab systems to keep conversations organized. Through the Meta Business Suite, messages across different platforms can be managed in one place, making communication seamless.
Getting started is simple. Add a Send Message button to your Facebook Page so customers can reach out with a single tap.
#6. Measure Your Progress
Mapping your journey requires knowing your landmarks. Insights, which can be accessed through the Professional dashboard, can help you understand what’s working and what’s not. Knowing how your audience responds to your content allows you to refine what you post more effectively.
You can track your company profile’s performance using metrics from the last 7, 14, or 28 days, focusing on key data such as views, engagement, net followers, and more. The tool also provides insights into Reels, posts, and follower trends.
Advertisement. A campaign review can run beyond one screen. Learn to capture a scrolling page with Snagit when you need a longer browser view for a report or discussion. SnagitPro walks through the capture options and the checks to make when a page will not scroll correctly.
Keep in mind that some insights may have limitations. For example, you’ll need at least 100 followers (who are not also friends) before follower insights become available.
#7. Ride the Trend Tide
Social media can sometimes feel like an enclosed bubble, but there’s so much more to it. Trends play a key role in helping companies stay relevant and keep their brand image fresh.
AI is transforming marketing by enabling faster content creation through generative tools that produce advertisement copy, images, and videos. Meta Advantage+ is a suite of AI-driven tools designed to help optimize end-to-end campaign strategies to maximize campaign performance. It also enhances personalization by delivering more tailored ads based on user behavior and preferences.
However, algorithms and trends keep evolving, and that creates an opportunity. By keeping an eye on what’s trending and staying innovative, you can keep your message ahead of the curve.
Reimagining Your Company on Facebook
Your Facebook presence plays a key role in strengthening your company’s credibility on social media. By following best practices, you can cut through the noise and capture the attention of your audience. But what does that look like in practice?
Book an appointment with us today and discover how we can elevate your company’s Facebook presence.
Global One Media Featured in Entrepreneur APAC on the Shift to Digital Investor Consumption
Investor communication is changing quickly as modern investors increasingly consume market information through social media, video, mobile platforms, and algorithmic feeds. While public companies have traditionally relied on press releases, investor decks, and quarterly calls, many modern investor audiences now expect clearer, faster, and more accessible formats.
This shift is central to the work of Global One Media, an investor marketing and digital communications company serving publicly listed and pre-IPO companies in Singapore and across the Asia-Pacific region.
Bastien Boulay, Founder and CEO of Global One Media, recently shared his perspective on digital investor consumption in an Entrepreneur APAC article on how investor behavior is outpacing traditional public company communication.
“I came from the marketing world, not the traditional investor relations world,” Bastien Boulay observes. “That outsider perspective helped me see that public companies needed the same clarity, creativity, and distribution that consumer brands had already learned to use. A lot of public companies have strong stories, but they need better ways to explain those stories. Our role is to help them communicate with the right level of clarity, credibility, and reach.”
Empowering investors through accessible technology can shift the historical norm of passive retail engagement toward more active participation. With Global One Media, Boulay is helping companies respond to this transition by making corporate communications more accessible to an increasingly online investor audience through social media, video strategies, and other digital formats.
“I did not build Global One Media to make investor communication louder,” Boulay explains. “I built it to make investor communication clearer, more useful, and more human. The goal is to provide reliable, highly structured educational context that helps market participants safely navigate company data without the hype or stock-promotion language often found in unregulated forums.”
Global One Media’s approach also reflects the growing need for public companies to communicate across regions and time zones. For North American and international issuers looking to reach Asian investor audiences, platforms such as Global One Media’s SmallCap Asia help create a more localized channel for market education and digital visibility.
“Singapore is a serious strategic base for us,” Boulay notes. “As a Canadian founder based in Singapore, I see a clear opportunity to help Canadian-listed and international public companies connect with Asian investor audiences. SmallCap Asia is a major part of our APAC strategy because it gives us a local voice, an established platform, and a way to build more educational investor content from Singapore.”
As investor consumption continues to move online, public companies are being pushed to think beyond traditional investor relations. The next phase of market communication will likely depend on clarity, regional reach, video-led storytelling, and the ability to meet investors where they already spend time.
“Markets never really sleep anymore,” Boulay points out. “Our structure was built around that reality: companies are global, investors are global, and the communication engine has to move across time zones.”
How to Stand Out on X (Twitter): Proven Strategies for Smarter Posts
Key takeaways:
- Posting with a clear strategy is more effective than posting often.
- Use hashtags and mentions carefully. A few relevant ones work better than many.
- Interactive content like polls, media, and quick replies drives higher engagement.
- The algorithm changes, so adapt your approach and keep testing new formats.
Standing out on X (formerly Twitter) isn’t about posting more—it’s about posting smarter. With millions of posts published every day, the difference between being ignored and getting people to talk often comes down to a few smart moves. Using catchy hooks, the right hashtags, and subtle tweaks can make a big impact. This guide outlines what works, why it works, and how you can keep up as the platform changes, so your posts get seen and start conversations.
Disclaimer: X’s algorithm is always changing. What works today may change tomorrow, so it’s important to stay up-to-date with platform updates and trends.
Building Strong Posts on X
Want your posts on X to reach more people? Use this proven content formula:
Hook → Value → Proof → Nudge
- Hook: The opening line that makes people stop scrolling. This could be a bold statement, an intriguing question, or a surprising statistic.
- Value: Share something useful. Teach, inform, or entertain with one clear takeaway.
- Proof: Back it up with an example, data, or a visual that supports your message.
- Nudge: End with a soft call-to-action, like inviting replies or encouraging a click.
Why this works: X uses machine learning and quality filters to rank posts. Engagement plays a huge role. Posts that drive replies, clicks, and conversations are far more likely to appear in more feeds.
What We Can Learn From Viral Posts
Case A: Oreo’s “Dunk in the Dark”
During the 2013 Super Bowl blackout, Oreo went viral with a simple post: “You can still dunk in the dark.” The tweet pulled in more than 15,000 retweets in a day and became the gold standard for real-time content.
Case B: Wendy’s community playbook
Wendy’s turned tweets into conversations rather than ads. By mixing humor, quick replies, and timely sports banter, they dominated March Madness with 140M impressions, 2M engagements, and a 12% boost in foot traffic.
What’s the Formula Behind Both?
- Context: Tie into existing conversations.
- Speed: Post while the moment is fresh.
- Clarity: One visual idea. One joke or one insight.
- Relatable: Use humor or a personal angle that people connect with.
- Conversation: Invite replies, then reply fast.
These patterns match how X’s algorithm ranks posts: fresh, relevant, and highly engaging content are more likely to capture investor and customer attention.
Multimedia & Interactive Content on X
Grabbing attention is everything on X. Posts with visuals or interactive elements consistently outperform plain text. According to X, tweets with photos get 35% more retweets, videos get 28% more, and quotes see a 19% lift compared to plain text.
Polls are another effective way to boost engagement. They’re quick to answer, which makes people more likely to interact. X also notes that replying to your audience can double engagement, improving how your post ranks in feeds.
For listed companies, adding visuals and interactive elements not only drives customer engagement but also attracts coverage from analysts and financial media.
The key is to keep the conversation going. Respond to comments and stay active to maximize reach and engagement.
Effective Tagging on X
Tags and mentions are shortcuts that help people discover your posts. When used correctly, they can boost your reach naturally without feeling forced.
Hashtags and Cashtags: Hashtags make your posts easier to find and can boost engagement by nearly 50% for brands and up to 100% for individuals. Cashtags work similarly in finance, and studies show they’re now a regular part of X. About one in every 8,000 tweets includes a stock symbol, showing how much market talk is happening on the platform.
Mentions: Tagging works best when it adds context or drives discussion. Mention creators, partners, or sources that are actually relevant to your post. Randomly tagging lots of accounts rarely helps and can even come across as spammy.
Do’s and Don’ts that still hold up
Keep it simple, keep it smart. These best practices still work today if you want your X posts to stand out:
Do
- Use 1–2 relevant hashtags only. Keep them light and relevant.
- Write for conversations, not just likes. Ask questions, invite replies, and engage in threads.
- Use clear media. Short videos, sharp images, or clean carousels.
Don’t
- Spam hashtags. Using more than two can compromise readability and divert focus from your message.
- Hide the good part. Make the main point clear in the first 100 characters.
- Skip accessibility. Add alt text and captions to reach a broader audience.
Algorithms Evolve – Keep Learning
Success on X comes down to clarity, timing, and sparking authentic conversations. The algorithm may shift, but relevant, engaging posts still win. This matters even more for publicly traded companies. Strong content can shape both customer perception and investor confidence, and it can also influence how the market talks about a company.
Share your updates in ways that move markets. Partner with Global One Media today.